TME “seed-soil”&“Ping-pong”

Stephen Paget seed-soil

  • 1994:  76 articles
  • 2004:  331 (3 folds/1decade)
  • 2010: 4861 (15 folds/ half decade)

Post-Paget era 

  • ‘Ping-pong’ experiments (IP Witz  Cancer Res, 1989)
    • BALB/c 3T3 in vitro- in vivo injection (ping)
    • Recultured from in vivo tumor (pong)
    • In vivo passage cells was considerably augmented as compared to that of in vitro maintained clonal ancestors.
    • In vivo “TME induces of pro-tumor effect.”
  • Class II cancer gene  (R. Sager PNAS, 1997)
    • Many of class II genes are regulated by TME.
    • Shifting focus from DNA to RNA

Non-tumor cells in TME are different from those in normal ME.

  • Structural and functional alteration in TME
  • Paracrine signal from tumor cell or normal cell
  • Promalignant factors in TME
  • Hypoxia (necrosis) in TME
  • Low glucose concentration in TME

Question? 

  • Normalization of abnormal non-tumor constituents may reduce the malignancy phenotype?
  • Tumor reversion is, indeed, possible?
  • Not sufficiently cured  by tumor cell eradication alone?
  • Is there a hierarchy of interaction?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s